Darktable vs Lightroom: The Ultimate Layout Showdown

Corel's AfterShot Pro has been making waves in the RAW editing market, posing a significant challenge to Adobe's dominance with Lightroom. With its own proprietary algorithm for rendering RAW images and claims of significantly faster batch editing capabilities, it's no wonder many photographers are curious about this new contender. But how does AfterShot Pro stack up against the industry-standard Lightroom? Let's dive into the details.

One of the most notable differences between the two programs is their approach to localized edits. While AfterShot Pro offers speedy batching and a compact one-screen workflow, its localized editing capabilities still have a way to go to catch up with Lightroom's excellent options. On the other hand, Lightroom uses the Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) algorithm, which often produces narrower tonal ranges and slightly washed-out colors.

Another significant difference is how each program renders RAW images. AfterShot Pro uses its own proprietary algorithm, resulting in images that are often better than those produced by ACR. This has led some photographers to switch from Lightroom to AfterShot Pro for their editing needs.

But what about the claims of faster batch editing? According to Corel's website, the latest version of AfterShot Pro can handle batch editing up to 4 times faster than Lightroom. While this may be an attractive feature for many photographers, it's essential to note that there are still some issues that need to be overcome before AfterShot Pro can properly challenge Lightroom.

In conclusion, while AfterShot Pro offers some impressive features and capabilities, including its proprietary algorithm and speedy batch editing, it still has some way to go to catch up with the industry-standard Lightroom. Ultimately, the choice between these two programs will depend on your individual editing needs and preferences.

Darktable lightroom layout